Reply to Zelyas and Robinson

Reply to Robinson.

TO THE EDITOR—We thank Robinson [1] for the comments about our report [2] and for the opportunity to clarify our findings. As we stated in our research protocol (clinical trials registration NCT00500578) in the Materials and Methods section in our report, as well as in our response to Fätkenheuer et al [3], the prespecified significance threshold for declaring one arm superior to the other was ...

Reply to Robinson et al.: Building the evidence base on the forest cover effects of community titling.

We thank Robinson et al. (1) for their thoughtful comments on our article (2). We agree with their main point, which is that our findings about the link between titling and forest cover change are contextand time-specific, and do not necessarily generalize to other countries and other periods. However, it is important to make clear that our article (2): (i ) does not claim to present generaliza...

The Authors’ Reply

The Authors’ Reply

Reply to Collignon and

TO THE EDITOR—We read with interest the correspondence from Collignon and Kennedy [1] regarding the duration of carriage of resistant bacteria after travelers return from tropical regions. The authors discussed the divergence in duration using a study they published in 2010 [2] and the VOYAG-R study [3]. While the overall design of both studies is similar, some key points are not. Importantly, ...